A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result places are topic to rigorous controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their lawful team has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply seeking to create a relatives home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your problem that numerous observers see as increasingly typical. As sea levels rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The René Collier and Paul Feely Irish Occasions post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite distinct Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-large h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive method.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Region of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.